May 4-11 2005 TIME OUT LONDON

 

PHALLACY

New End Theatre

 

Carl DjerassiÕs arts-versus-sciences detective yarn begins with a lecture: Regina Leitner-Opfermann, a specialist in classical antiquities, is expounding the aesthetic perfections of a Roman statue of a youth in her collection. When the subject of material analysis is raised, she declares the question ÔdullÕ—unaware that a team of chemists led by Rex Stolzfuss is about to use information relating to the proportions of trace metals found in the statueÕs bronze to prove that her beloved Roman boy is in fact a Renaissance fake, or at best a copy.

 

ÒPhallacyÓ is the latest of eminent chemist DjerassiÕs Ôscience-in-theatreÕ plays. Suggested by a true story, the piece is packed with fascinating scientific and art historical facts, but is at its best dramatically when it concentrates on academic satire—armed with his devastating findings, ÔcocksureÕ Rex begins by claiming that he wants to be ÔcollegialÕ but soon sets out to prove that Regina is not only scientifically ignorant but art-historically incompetent too. The slow-moving sixteenth-century flashback adds little to the interest of the piece, however, and the handling of the battle-of-the-sexes strand of the story—both chemists are male, both art historians females—lacks sureness of touch: the sub-plot concerning the angle of fall of the statueÕs penis provides the evening with a slightly limp climax.

 

 And Jordan production has some nice performances—fans of ÔMonarch of the GlenÕ will want to catch Hamish Clark in slouchy, affable boyish mode as RexÕs assistant Otto.

            Robert Shore