May 4-11 2005 TIME OUT LONDON
PHALLACY
New End Theatre
Carl DjerassiÕs
arts-versus-sciences detective yarn begins with a lecture: Regina
Leitner-Opfermann, a specialist in classical antiquities, is expounding the aesthetic
perfections of a Roman statue of a youth in her collection. When the subject of
material analysis is raised, she declares the question ÔdullÕ—unaware
that a team of chemists led by Rex Stolzfuss is about to use information
relating to the proportions of trace metals found in the statueÕs bronze to
prove that her beloved Roman boy is in fact a Renaissance fake, or at best a
copy.
ÒPhallacyÓ is the latest of
eminent chemist DjerassiÕs Ôscience-in-theatreÕ plays. Suggested by a true
story, the piece is packed with fascinating scientific and art historical
facts, but is at its best dramatically when it concentrates on academic
satire—armed with his devastating findings, ÔcocksureÕ Rex begins by
claiming that he wants to be ÔcollegialÕ but soon sets out to prove that Regina
is not only scientifically ignorant but art-historically incompetent too. The
slow-moving sixteenth-century flashback adds little to the interest of the
piece, however, and the handling of the battle-of-the-sexes strand of the
story—both chemists are male, both art historians females—lacks
sureness of touch: the sub-plot concerning the angle of fall of the statueÕs
penis provides the evening with a slightly limp climax.
And Jordan production has some nice performances—fans
of ÔMonarch of the GlenÕ will want to catch Hamish Clark in slouchy, affable
boyish mode as RexÕs assistant Otto.
Robert
Shore